-
Website
http://www.last100.com/ -
Original page
http://www.last100.com/2007/10/04/zune-2-five-things-microsoft-did-right/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
charlieanzman
1 comment · 11 points
-
siliconbits
1 comment · 1 points
-
venkat2009
2 comments · 1 points
-
Bowenarrow
2 comments · 1 points
-
Swing Trading
3 comments · 2 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
The Gadget Show Live 2010 – discounted tickets available
3 days ago · 1 comment
-
Review: HTC Tattoo (vs HTC Hero) – Android’s mass-market future?
6 days ago · 1 comment
-
The Gadget Show Live 2010 – discounted tickets available
Support of Podcasts? Mean the podcast I have going to my iPod video aren't real?
Firmware that makes the previous version of the Zune not suck so much?
These are things they should have done at the BEGINNING!
Question, were you PAID for this "review" by Microsoft?
a) I didn't charge it when I was syncing
b) Using wireless uses even more battery
Awesome.
Yes, the Zune can sync wirelessly and will do so any time power is provided to the unit (dock, charger, etc.) It can also sync wirelessly when you tell it to... Can your iPod/iPhone do that... NO!
When was the last time Apple gave something free to its last generation iPod users? The 6th gen "iPod Classic" doesn't sport any new hardware (except the larger HDD), yet the 5th gen and the 5.5 don't get any of the new features...
While we're on the topic, I'd like to commend MS for releasing an 80GB mp3 player that supports more codecs than Apple's iPod for $100 less than the iPod (and with a larger screen too!)
You'd probably see all this if Job's splooge wasn't in your eyes.
I sense an apple fanboy.
The wifi synching just means that whenever it is left to charge (plugged into a wall or perhaps sitting and waiting in the car while the zune is docked in the car), the zune can sync up. It's a good feature.
As for Microsoft having to get it right from the beginning, Apple didn't get everything right from the beginning either. The iPod used to be only for the Mac, remember? That was a mistake which they later fixed.
Gizmodo consists mostly of iPhone fanboys (hence why they call it the Jesus Phone). The fact that they actually liked the Zune says something.
You're such a fucking sheep its almost funny....Almost
http://www.macproguide.com/zune_dell.jpg
1) Wifi syncing when plugged in or docked - Research more and realize you have the option to
sync without being plugged in if you choose.
2) "Support if podcasts?" This article is called "five things MS did right", not why the Zune is better than the iPod - stop being so defensive.
3) "Firmware that makes the previous version..." I am sure there a millions of iPod users that WISH jobs would release firmware upgrades to that of the most current models, but he does not so you lose.
As for you Joel -
" Yay! Wireless Syncing, now I can be disappointed when I put stuff on it and the battery dies"
It sounds to me like someone is justifying the lack of a feature on their unit. If you need a battery charge and to sync, you can do so at the same time, but if you choose only to sync no need for cables.
You mac guys LOVE cables and old firmware.
WHAT I REALLY LOVE IS MY 300 IPHONE THAT HAS LESS THAN 10 GIGS OF MEMORY! I KNOW I COULD HAVE JUST BOUGHT A POCKET PC AND A HUGE SD CARD THAT WOULD DO EVERYTHING THE ITOUCH DOES AND MORE FOR LESS MONEY, BUT ITS NOT APPLE, SO I HATE IT.
To say that nobody on the Subway is using them is a great nod to the other device manufacturers as they have a stranglehold on the market; in a sense the same stranglehold that is on the Desktop PC market.
A good way for the Mac FanFag's to understand it is, the Mac computer is slowly growing in populartity the same way the Zune is growing in popularity; one difference is the Zune has been around for a year or two while the Mac OS has been around about 20 years or so.
To top that off the OS is written off of the Open Source KDE kernel, modified and closed off (how fucking cheap is that). Now the iPod has a very critical flaw in its' functionality that anyone outside of the FanFag world knows about.....the impossibility of syncing an iPod with nothing but iTunes software (which eats more memory than the Ebola Virus!!!).
If I can drop music on the Zune via drive letters than it's a damn wonderful world and I have no reason to even contemplate an iPod.
Go ahead and bash truthful points with childish profanity and just lose all cred.
BTW - I do own a Zune and an Archos 605, I am not a fanboy, just an educated consumer.
Great, now we know you're an authority on the subject! We should all turn to you for an unbiased opinion regarding PMPs!
"I’m glad MS came out with something for the rest of us that don’t want to all look the same."
In the mean time you continue to use MS Windows, just like the other 90+% of PC using sheep out there. You can criticize Apple/Mac/iPod fanboys any way you like, but as an MS lover, one thing you can't criticize them for is being a "sheep".
I can name about 5-6 different products which are far superior to Apple's. They cost less, have a much better interface, and have a ton more features. While Microsoft and Apple openly engage in a pissing match between themselves, there are a bunch of companies who are quietly moving beyond what they're currently offering.
Here's a hint - Cowon.
Obviously, apple lovers want the others to know how awesome caps lock is...because we must not have known based on Apple Lover X's remark.
I've owned the 1st gen iPod and the 1st gen video iPod. I've also owned a Toshiba Gigabeat. That said and knowing the capabilities of the Zune 2, I know what my next option will be. Personally, I'm not a big fan of iTunes either and would much rather use a subscription based service like Napster for music.
The Zune 2 gets a thumbs up from me.
Being a user and administrator of both, I don't have this retarded bias of PC sucks or Mac sucks, they both have their ups and downs, and the whole Microsoft sucks thing is weak also, people need to get over theirselves and get away from the fanboy tendancies.
The Zune 2 is a quality piece of hardware, period.
http://www.wsbtv.com/news/14271878/detail.html
Sadly, that statement is not true ladies and gentlemen. Apple has become rich playing off the fact that most of the consumer market are idiots about technology. So they make products that are aesthetically pleasing and have no room for customization what so ever. Last time I checked adults don't play with Fisher-Price toys, so why would someone who knows a thing or two about technology want to use a device using Fisher-Price's new OS?
But the choice always has been and always will be yours. if you like things to be more automated then you go with the iPod but if you like to mess customize your product to what you want it to be and not get penalized for it like in case of the iPhone you get the Zune.
http://diveintomark.org/archives/2007/10/04/if-...
i own a nano 1st gen. by far the nicest looking nano ever. but im pissed with itunes. doing software dev myself, i cannot understand why itunes such a sucky piece of software. like seriously... and a > 40MB download??!? like seriously... i could use like iTunes 5 for the functionality i need. why force me run such a shit piece of sluggish software. i'm annoyed. i used the trial version of MGTEK's dopisp or something to sync it with WMP... better experience.
and i hate you shallow apple fan boys. it's like talking to a 3yr old kid or you stubborn little wife. grrr!
The Apple Classic (160gb) just met that criteria. Unfortunately, the new UI does not appeal to me, and i'm left still without a music player.
The Zune 2 really impressed me, and I'd buy one in a second, if they had a 160gb (i'd even be willing to settle for a 120gb).
/sigh
Lets hope they release a Zune 2.1 with a larger HD (and a larger screen :))
Actually, the Mac-only iPod was a conscious decision by Apple for two reasons. First off, it allowed far greater control over the hardware to software link. It allowed them to fully control the experience and ensure there were no gaps for the end user before expanding the operating system requirements. Secondly, this was a selling point for the entire iTunes Music Store (as it was known back then). Record companies were uneasy about the concept of digital music and allowing it to be downloaded through an online store. With the iPod and iTunes Music Store only being available on Mac computers for the foreseeable future at this time, many of the decisions to take part in the store by labels were based on the fact that were any problems to arise, or at worst, the entire digital music platform fail head over heels, the tainted pool would be entirely Macintosh-based, which was at the time some 3% of the entire computing industry. It was a success, of course, and pioneered the way digital music is accessed today. The decision to move the iTunes Music Store to PC and allow PC compatibility was not a light hearted one. It would need to be fully backed by the labels and Apple would need to ensure a seamless experience; something they did, and something the labels did do because they realised this was a potentially very profitable source for them.
Just thought I'd point that out! Kind of concerned me that people think the iPod was made for Mac only originally as some kind of mistake or laziness. There was a true meaning behind it.
I am now wondering if you buy a Zune if you have to purchase all your digital rights managed products through them.
If so, it seems like Apple and Microsoft are doing the same crap, forcing you to use buy music from them so they can corner the market. I much prefer the open approach where others can compete.
There are so many MP3 players out there I have 2 iPods the mini and the Nano. I got them both as gifts. They do look nice.
I think though next time when I buy one for myself I am going to look around at other manufacturers that users open standards rather than proprietary crap that puts me in a box so i have no choice but to buy their stuff.
As far as this discussion goes, the apple tards (first post and Apple Lover X -- which I think are both actually trolling this comment section) are ignorant sheep who only help exact the rage of those who don't use apple projects. Apple is a company, not a religion. Do you worship Toyota or Ford? I hope not... get a life.
Microsoft has a great product here. I'm thinking about buying one for the hell of it.
Criticize me all you want on grammar and spelling... i am really not very sober at the moment of writing this. The point remains the same, my new device will be the zune and not apple because apple fails to support their product like the zune appears to due.
I don't think you will find a car audio system that will integrate well with a Zune for some time, or ever. I have a 7" Pioneer system that has beautiful on-screen interface and exceptional audio quality with any 'dockable' iPod.
Apple updated all of their older iPods with AAC, Audible, and Apple Lossless support when they introduced those new features for new iPods.
Last year when Apple introduced the 5.5G iPods, the new features that were added from the original iPod with Video were:
1. Improved battery life for video (hardware and software improvements)
2. Support for better resolution video when using video out
3. Support for games
4. Scrolling through the song list put a letter overlay
5. Searching the song list by typing the name
6. Adjustable brightness control
All of those features were added to the original iPod with video except for the hardware improvments in battery life (obviously) and #5.
Personally, I dont care what provides me with my music, just that its my music, and its portable. Plus there's the wow factor, but both these products recieve that hands down.
I think Zune 2 will be better than ipod because it is relatively the same size, it uses a glass screen about 5x tougher than an ipod screen, has more features and an even bigger screen than the older one, ipod hasnt changed much though and i feel like its gonna get run over.. i wont both music players to compete :P so they always improve for us
As others as stated read about the Zune b4 you comment and stop flapping off at the mouth.
My Zune 30 is solid, apart from the design of the player it's top notch. Version 2 is even better.
Props to Microsoft and the Zune team.
Can’t wait to get the Zune 80.
and cost... total package price a fraction of a mac, with their iTV, Ipod, slingbox (outside of the apple ecosystem), and this combo misses high def gaming.
and what do you think MS is going to do now that ford is putting it's software in all of it's cars in 2008
apple is falling behind and nobody is paying attention. one day they will see it all slip away just like netscape when IE snuck up on them when they weren't looking.
n i hav been using ipod since 1 yr.... but i like my zune much more.... it has better sound quality dan ipod....screen is big too... n navigation menu is super coool... i was ipod fan ... but now i dont' feel like pickin up my ipod at all ... zune really rocks... try it guys...m not biased .. but i really felt so.. :) ... try it once... u will fall in luv wid it...
Too late huh? Remember Netscape? The web browser corner belonged to Netscape for years and years and years. Then came Internet Explorer. Who owns the browser corner now? Where is Netscape now? Their puppy (mozilla/firefox) has more fans than Netscape.
BTW, I hate M$ & I'm an Opera fan.
if u want to be different, and not be on the bandwagon but keep up with technology get a zune2
if u want to be like every1 else, get an ipod. ipod touch. or hell the waist of money iphone
as for all you "mac sheep" and "ms sheep" SHUT THE HELL UP. quit your belly aching.
these buisness'es dont really care about what you like and dont like.. they just want a quick easy way of make a billion more dollers.. im sure they would kill a baby or two just to make a million.
in 10 years we'll be saying the iphone ipod the zune MS computers and mac computers suck..
because our hologram solar mp3 player that is the size of quarter. but emits a 1-3 foot holgraphic screen can do anything u ask it to. including tell u when u need to take a deuce.
and they cant.
thank you for your time.
dont be h8n
well, call me a PC fanboy all you want, but I really think it's an easier, more customizable interface.
Microsoft should have a commercial with the same PC/Mac characters, and then PC should say "meet my friends" and they'll be all different people, and Mac should say "meet mine" and there are all these clones behind him.
and Apple is right for differentiating between a Mac and a PC. Mac's aren't "personal computers" they're "generalized, pretty looking, graphics" - maybe Jobs liked a painting of an apple tree and thought it was pretty, than realized that all the other trees looked pretty too...
The iPod is only considered "better" because it was released first. The zune is great and beats anything ive ever used.
Apple fans, aka "the computer illiterate" your day has come.
Video and audio quality are amazing.
And the new FREE firmware update is far better than any apple firmware.
When was the last time apple had a firmware update?
Never. They make you buy a whole new iPod! Bye bye paycheck!
Also. MS supports individuality... Do I see customizable backgrounds on the horizon? Oh wait. Zune already has that! Every iPod has the same sterile white background. Hideous. And when you listen to music, album art takes up the whole screen instead of just a small corner.
And what about durability? iPods are flimsy. They "tough metal" backs are easily dented and warped. The zune has a more solid construction. As well as a stronger display.
The new controls on the zune 2 are much better than that annpying click wheel. making my thumb dizzy.
You can call me a PC fanboy. But I prefer the term "computer literate"
anyway GO MS apple sux
Blake