<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>last100 - Latest Comments in With death of DRM imminent, what&amp;#8217;s next for iTunes?</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://last100.disqus.com/with_death_of_drm_imminent_what8217s_next_for_itunes/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:26:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: With death of DRM imminent, what&amp;#8217;s next for iTunes?</title><link>http://www.last100.com/2008/01/04/with-death-of-drm-imminent-whats-next-for-itunes/#comment-9507739</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Steve, you make some valid points, I'll give you that. On the other hand, who would have thought that Starbucks, a coffee company, would launch a record label? Stranger things have happened is all I'm saying :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mack D. Male</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 20:26:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: With death of DRM imminent, what&amp;#8217;s next for iTunes?</title><link>http://www.last100.com/2008/01/04/with-death-of-drm-imminent-whats-next-for-itunes/#comment-9507738</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@ Robert&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm not sure Apple will ever start a record label, for several reasons.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;1) It may conflict with their trademark since the Beatles-owned label Apple records still exists. They've already clashed in court with Apple, although some agreement was recently met - not sure if that gives way to Apple using the name more freely in a music-associated business or not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;2) It would antagonize the four majors to such a degree that the iTunes Store could become a graveyard aside from Apple's own content acquisitions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;3) Do artists really need a new label, even one as "cool" as Apple? A trend maybe to go-it-alone ala Radiohead. In which case, iTunes just needs to become more favorable to "indie" artists (with better terms).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve O'Hear (editor)</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 11:59:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: With death of DRM imminent, what&amp;#8217;s next for iTunes?</title><link>http://www.last100.com/2008/01/04/with-death-of-drm-imminent-whats-next-for-itunes/#comment-9507737</link><description>&lt;p&gt;DRM free music being sold elsewhere will play on iPods, which leaves Apple free to REALLY piss off the record companies by starting a record company.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;An iTunes based record company would cut out the middle man record companies and immediately have a huge audience and brand recognition.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robert Castelo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 02:53:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>