<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>last100 - Latest Comments in Why Chrome is a win-win for Google</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://last100.disqus.com/why_chrome_is_a_win_win_for_google/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:00:35 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why Chrome is a win-win for Google</title><link>http://www.last100.com/2008/09/04/why-chrome-is-a-win-win-for-google/#comment-9509914</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I predict a 90% chance that Google will not develop a version for MacOSX.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If one is to assume, as many do, that MacOSX is a "fringe" market, then Chrome may well be somewhat of a good thing for Google. Many Windows will find it appealing for its speed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Even a few Windows (and perhaps increasing) users are under the spell of Google services on Windows (gmail, picasa, documents, and even sites/apps).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If access to all these is made significantly easier via Chrome, and if Chrome is a centerpiece of Android down the road, then Chrome can hardly fail.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Albo P. Fossa</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:00:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Chrome is a win-win for Google</title><link>http://www.last100.com/2008/09/04/why-chrome-is-a-win-win-for-google/#comment-9509913</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes Microsoft is hard to beat but google will always be a winner. They just seem to have the brightest and the best!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Katelyne</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:19:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Chrome is a win-win for Google</title><link>http://www.last100.com/2008/09/04/why-chrome-is-a-win-win-for-google/#comment-9509912</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Google won't gain marketshare at the expense of IE, it'll be at the expense of Firefox and Opera. Firefox also has a new JavaScript rendering engine which is supposed to be extremely efficient. My money's on them - they've been building this thing a lot longer. As a consumer, what's my motivation to switch?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But Google can't "lose" anything - they've got gobs of money to invest in any project they want and tons of influence on the web given their advertising network and #1 search engine.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Z</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:11:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Chrome is a win-win for Google</title><link>http://www.last100.com/2008/09/04/why-chrome-is-a-win-win-for-google/#comment-9509911</link><description>&lt;p&gt;IE8 has had the isolated tabs feature since March, so it's not a completely new idea. I completely agree that Chrome is going to gain market share. Another benefit might just be that it will enable Google to build more intensive web apps in the future, as Chrome and other browsers get faster and more reliable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mack D. Male</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:23:35 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>