<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>last100 - Latest Comments in TwitterPeek: a device for tweeting and nothing else</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://last100.disqus.com/twitterpeek_a_device_for_tweeting_and_nothing_else/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:44:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: TwitterPeek: a device for tweeting and nothing else</title><link>http://www.last100.com/2009/10/29/twitterpeek-a-device-for-tweeting-and-nothing-else/#comment-21742645</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very legit. I wonder how many people would go for this over the original &lt;a href="http://twitter.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="twitter.com"&gt;twitter.com&lt;/a&gt; though. I made a poll just now - it'd be interesting to see how the numbers play out @ &lt;a href="http://www.dipoll.com/?p=614" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.dipoll.com/?p=614"&gt;http://www.dipoll.com/?p=614&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Noogle</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:44:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>