<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>last100 - Latest Comments in Q&amp;amp;A: We7 CEO Steve Purdham</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://last100.disqus.com/qampa_we7_ceo_steve_purdham/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 10:06:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Q&amp;amp;A: We7 CEO Steve Purdham</title><link>http://www.last100.com/2008/01/30/qa-we7-ceo-steve-purdham/#comment-9507824</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The latest attempt at new music distribution may be to give the music away free, but this is unsustainable from a cost/revenue perspective. There is not enough advertising demand available to subsidize the $30billion digital music market with ads; and if the inventory were created anyway, it would seriously deflate the display and keyword ad market.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Digital music market is now at $30 billion and rising (including illegal downloads). While digital advertising is only at $20 billion and slowing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There's an excellent analysis at Brooding Savage blog. &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.BroodingSavage.com/journal/2008/2/7/ad-supported-music-1.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.BroodingSavage.com/journal/2008/2/7/ad-supported-music-1.html"&gt;http://www.BroodingSavage.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bill</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 10:06:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>