<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>last100 - Latest Comments in Introducing Babelgum (Joost isn&amp;#8217;t the only game in town)</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://last100.disqus.com/introducing_babelgum_joost_isn8217t_the_only_game_in_town/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 04:20:52 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Introducing Babelgum (Joost isn&amp;#8217;t the only game in town)</title><link>http://www.last100.com/2007/05/29/introducing-babelgum-joost-isnt-the-only-game-in-town/#comment-9505616</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We like Joost a lot - that's why we started &lt;a href="http://JuicedonJoost.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="JuicedonJoost.com"&gt;JuicedonJoost.com&lt;/a&gt; about it, but we agree that it's not perfect and not necessarily the answer to the "We hate cable" situation. For mass acceptance, quality, brand-name content must be presented in a simple-to-use fashion. My wife has struggled with the Joost interface (still not like a TV), and the download is spotty at best. It's no fun watching a show in 2-3 second increments!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alan Abbey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 04:20:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Introducing Babelgum (Joost isn&amp;#8217;t the only game in town)</title><link>http://www.last100.com/2007/05/29/introducing-babelgum-joost-isnt-the-only-game-in-town/#comment-9505615</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Competition is very healthy, feels likes Joost has the first mover advantage.  Only time will tell who gets traction coming out of BETA and gets the love from users.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They both have much more of a social video networking vibe rather than just being a video platform.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Will be fun to see who comes out on top!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Video Squad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 01:32:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Introducing Babelgum (Joost isn&amp;#8217;t the only game in town)</title><link>http://www.last100.com/2007/05/29/introducing-babelgum-joost-isnt-the-only-game-in-town/#comment-9505614</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Joost on my Mac mini recognised the Apple Remote. So I expect any programmable remote could work with either service.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve O'Hear (editor)</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 16:44:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Introducing Babelgum (Joost isn&amp;#8217;t the only game in town)</title><link>http://www.last100.com/2007/05/29/introducing-babelgum-joost-isnt-the-only-game-in-town/#comment-9505613</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sadly at the moment neither of these are going to replace my Media Center (part of Vista) experience for one simple reason.....&lt;br&gt;They claim to be a "lean back" experience, but where's the remote control.&lt;br&gt;I can't sit on the couch with a beer in one hand, a remote in the other and.... well, you get the drift.&lt;br&gt;I also want to not have to rely on Comcast to give me CSI on-demand. If Joost is going to win it's going to need some serious content partnerships and let me watch what I want, when I want (and while they're at it partner with Netflix to combine the Instant Watch movie experience).... I'd pay a subscription and happily dump Comcast Cable if I hd something simple enough for me, my wife and daughter to watch what we want when we want (ideally commercial free!)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">OffBeatMammal</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 13:25:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>