<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>last100 - Latest Comments in AT&amp;amp;T to police the Internet</title><link>http://last100.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://last100.disqus.com/atampt_to_police_the_internet/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 03:55:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T to police the Internet</title><link>http://www.last100.com/2007/06/13/att-to-police-the-internet/#comment-9505735</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The ever looming prescence of big brother looming over us is just about ta make me snap!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ID</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 03:55:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AT&amp;amp;T to police the Internet</title><link>http://www.last100.com/2007/06/13/att-to-police-the-internet/#comment-9505734</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No worries my friend. The thousands of hackers working on the next generation of P2P protocols will make them indistinguishable from normal net traffic or other binary streams like Skype.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Incidentally, do you realize what kind of computing power is necessary to analyze every IP packet from 1 million users for "contraband"? And how error-prone such analysis is?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peter</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:33:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>